|Aangeboden in rubriek:
Hebt u iets om te verkopen?

Who Is to Judge? : The Perennial Debate over Whether to Elect or Appoint...

Objectstaat:
Heel goed
Prijs:
US $14,99
OngeveerEUR 13,86
Verzendkosten:
US $4,87 (ongeveer EUR 4,50) Voordelige verzendservice. Details bekijkenvoor verzending
Bevindt zich in: Silver Spring, Maryland, Verenigde Staten
Levering:
Geschatte levering tussen ma, 3 jun en vr, 7 jun tot 43230
De levertijd wordt geschat met onze eigen methode op basis van onder meer de nabijheid van de koper ten opzichte van de objectlocatie, de geselecteerde verzendservice, en de verzendgeschiedenis van de verkoper. De leveringstermijnen kunnen variëren, vooral gedurende piekperiodes.
Retourbeleid:
Betalingen:
     

Winkel met vertrouwen

Geld-terug-garantie van eBay
Ontvang het object dat u hebt besteld of krijg uw geld terug. 

Verkopergegevens

Geregistreerd als particuliere verkoper, dus de consumentenrechten die voortvloeien uit de EU-wetgeving inzake consumentenbescherming zijn niet van toepassing. De geld-terug-garantie van eBay geldt nog steeds voor de meeste aankopen.
De verkoper neemt de volledige verantwoordelijkheid voor deze aanbieding.
eBay-objectnummer:354550058364
Laatst bijgewerkt op 23 okt 2023 03:36:13 CESTAlle herzieningen bekijkenAlle herzieningen bekijken

Specificaties

Objectstaat
Heel goed: Een boek dat er niet als nieuw uitziet en is gelezen, maar zich in uitstekende staat ...
ISBN
9780190887148
Publication Year
2019
Type
Textbook
Format
Hardcover
Language
English
Publication Name
Who Is to Judge? : the Perennial Debate over Whether to Elect or Appoint America's Judges
Item Height
0.7in
Author
Charles Gardner Geyh
Item Length
6.3in
Publisher
Oxford University Press, Incorporated
Item Width
9.7in
Item Weight
16.8 Oz
Number of Pages
216 Pages

Over dit product

Product Information

An elected judiciary is virtually unique to the American experience and creates a paradox in a representative democracy. Elected judges take an oath to uphold the law impartially, which calls upon them to swear off the influence of the very constituencies they must cultivate in order to attain and retain judicial office. This paradox has given rise to perennially shrill and unproductive binary arguments over the merits and demerits of elected and appointed judiciaries, which this project seeks to transcend and reimagine. In Who Is to Judge?, judicial politics expert Charles Gardner Geyh exposes and explains the overstatements of both sides in the judicial selection debate. When those exaggerations are understood as such, it becomes possible to search for common ground and its limits. Ultimately, this search leads Geyh to conclude that, while appointive systems are a preferable default, no one system of selection is best for all jurisdictions at all times.

Product Identifiers

Publisher
Oxford University Press, Incorporated
ISBN-10
0190887141
ISBN-13
9780190887148
eBay Product ID (ePID)
23038266089

Product Key Features

Author
Charles Gardner Geyh
Publication Name
Who Is to Judge? : the Perennial Debate over Whether to Elect or Appoint America's Judges
Format
Hardcover
Language
English
Publication Year
2019
Type
Textbook
Number of Pages
216 Pages

Dimensions

Item Length
6.3in
Item Height
0.7in
Item Width
9.7in
Item Weight
16.8 Oz

Additional Product Features

Lc Classification Number
Kf8776.G49 2019
Reviews
"Brilliant intellectualism at its core, Who Is to Judge? is an expertly crafted discussion of the state judicial selection controversy, in which Geyh denounces stridency while embracing both normative ideals and empirical research. An exceptional contribution, this book is a rare yet outstanding example of how to transcend disciplinary divides, bridge the gap between science and practical politics, and offer constructive solutions the nation's mostenduring debates." --Melinda Gann Hall, Professor of Political Science at Michigan State University and author of Attacking Judges"Charlie Geyh is at it again--and we should all be thankful that he is! Weighing in once more, the author of 'Why Judicial Elections Stink' has given us his revisionist, evidence-based views on how state judges in this country ought to be selected and retained. Truly outstanding scholarship, irrespective of whether one is for or against electing judges. Who Is to Judge is not just erudite--the inimitable 'Geyh writing-style' is fun to read as well. Fewlegal academics have engaged the social science literature on judicial elections at the level that Geyh does. A definitive and essential contribution to our debates." --James L. Gibson, Sidney W. SouersProfessor of Government, Washington University in St. Louis"Geyh wades into the age-old question of how best to select and retain state court judges. It is a divisive issue that arises whenever there are judicial scandals or court decisions on which the citizenry is deeply divided. Geyh presents an invaluable analysis of the pros and cons of each system and defuses many of the traditional arguments for and against systemic change. A must-read for those interested in preserving public confidence in our state courtjudiciaries." --Edward W. Madeira, Jr., Esq., former Chairman of the American Bar Association Commissions on the 21st Century Judiciary, State Judicial Selection Standards, and Separation of Powers andJudicial Independence, and an ABA John Marshall Award recipient, "Brilliant intellectualism at its core, Who Is to Judge? is an expertly crafted discussion of the state judicial selection controversy, in which Geyh denounces stridency while embracing both normative ideals and empirical research. An exceptional contribution, this book is a rare yet outstanding example of how to transcend disciplinary divides, bridge the gap between science and practical politics, and offer constructive solutions the nation's most enduring debates." --Melinda Gann Hall, Professor of Political Science at Michigan State University and author of Attacking Judges"Charlie Geyh is at it again--and we should all be thankful that he is! Weighing in once more, the author of 'Why Judicial Elections Stink' has given us his revisionist, evidence-based views on how state judges in this country ought to be selected and retained. Truly outstanding scholarship, irrespective of whether one is for or against electing judges. Who Is to Judge is not just erudite--the inimitable 'Geyh writing-style' is fun to read as well. Few legal academics have engaged the social science literature on judicial elections at the level that Geyh does. A definitive and essential contribution to our debates." --James L. Gibson, Sidney W. Souers Professor of Government, Washington University in St. Louis"Geyh wades into the age-old question of how best to select and retain state court judges. It is a divisive issue that arises whenever there are judicial scandals or court decisions on which the citizenry is deeply divided. Geyh presents an invaluable analysis of the pros and cons of each system and defuses many of the traditional arguments for and against systemic change. A must-read for those interested in preserving public confidence in our state court judiciaries." --Edward W. Madeira, Jr., Esq., former Chairman of the American Bar Association Commissions on the 21st Century Judiciary, State Judicial Selection Standards, and Separation of Powers and Judicial Independence, and an ABA John Marshall Award recipient, "Brilliant intellectualism at its core, Who Is to Judge? is an expertly crafted discussion of the state judicial selection controversy, in which Geyh denounces stridency while embracing both normative ideals and empirical research. An exceptional contribution, this book is a rare yet outstanding example of how to transcend disciplinary divides, bridge the gap between science and practical politics, and offer constructive solutions the nation's most enduring debates." --Melinda Gann Hall, Professor of Political Science at Michigan State University and author of Attacking Judges "Charlie Geyh is at it again--and we should all be thankful that he is! Weighing in once more, the author of 'Why Judicial Elections Stink' has given us his revisionist, evidence-based views on how state judges in this country ought to be selected and retained. Truly outstanding scholarship, irrespective of whether one is for or against electing judges. Who Is to Judge is not just erudite--the inimitable 'Geyh writing-style' is fun to read as well. Few legal academics have engaged the social science literature on judicial elections at the level that Geyh does. A definitive and essential contribution to our debates." --James L. Gibson, Sidney W. Souers Professor of Government, Washington University in St. Louis "Geyh wades into the age-old question of how best to select and retain state court judges. It is a divisive issue that arises whenever there are judicial scandals or court decisions on which the citizenry is deeply divided. Geyh presents an invaluable analysis of the pros and cons of each system and defuses many of the traditional arguments for and against systemic change. A must-read for those interested in preserving public confidence in our state court judiciaries." --Edward W. Madeira, Jr., Esq., former Chairman of the American Bar Association Commissions on the 21st Century Judiciary, State Judicial Selection Standards, and Separation of Powers and Judicial Independence, and an ABA John Marshall Award recipient, "Brilliant intellectualism at its core, Who is to Judge? is an expertly crafted discussion of the state judicial selection controversy, in which Geyh denounces stridency while embracing both normative ideals and empirical research. An exceptional contribution, this book is a rare yet outstanding example of how to transcend disciplinary divides, bridge the gap between science and practical politics, and offer constructive solutions the nation's most enduring debates." --Melinda Gann Hall, Professor of Political Science at Michigan State University and author of Attacking Judges "Charlie Geyh is at it again--and we should all be thankful that he is! Weighing in once more, the author of 'Why Judicial Elections Stink' has given us his revisionist, evidence-based views on how state judges in this country ought to be selected and retained. Truly outstanding scholarship, irrespective of whether one is for or against electing judges. Who is to Judge is not just erudite--the inimitable 'Geyh writing-style' is fun to read as well. Few legal academics have engaged the social science literature on judicial elections at the level that Geyh does. A definitive and essential contribution to our debates." --James L. Gibson, Sidney W. Souers Professor of Government, Washington University in St. Louis "Geyh wades into the age-old question of how best to select and retain state court judges. It is a divisive issue that arises whenever there are judicial scandals or court decisions on which the citizenry is deeply divided. Geyh presents an invaluable analysis of the pros and cons of each system and defuses many of the traditional arguments for and against systemic change. A must-read for those interested in preserving public confidence in our state court judiciaries." --Edward W. Madeira, Jr., Esq., former Chairman of the American Bar Association Commissions on the 21st Century Judiciary, State Judicial Selection Standards, and Separation of Powers and Judicial Independence, and an ABA John Marshall Award recipient, Brilliant intellectualism at its core, Who is to Judge? is an expertly crafted discussion of the state judicial selection controversy, in which Geyh denounces stridency while embracing both normative ideals and empirical research. An exceptional contribution, this book is a rare yet outstanding example of how to transcend disciplinary divides, bridge the gap between science and practical politics, and offer constructive solutions the nation's mostenduring debates.
Table of Content
Chapter 1: Introduction Chapter 2: A Short and Pointed History of Judicial Selection Chapter 3: The New Judicial Selection Landscape Chapter 4: The Arguments Chapter 5: Why Everyone is Wrong Chapter 6: Managing the Selection Debate Chapter 7: The Future of Judicial Selection
Copyright Date
2019
Topic
General
Lccn
2018-031973
Dewey Decimal
347.73/14
Intended Audience
Scholarly & Professional
Dewey Edition
23
Genre
Law

Objectbeschrijving van de verkoper

zenaciss-0

zenaciss-0

100% positieve feedback
2 objecten verkocht
Reageert meestal binnen 24 uur
Geregistreerd als particuliere verkoper
Dus de consumentenrechten die voortvloeien uit EU-wetgeving voor consumentenbescherming zijn niet van toepassing. eBay-kopersbescherming geldt nog steeds voor de meeste aankopen.

Feedback verkoper (1)

m***m (1620)- Feedback gegeven door koper.
Vorig jaar
Geverifieerde aankoop
Thank you for fast shipping!